Examlex
John Rawls: A Theory of Justice
The social contract theory, which has roots in Plato and was developed by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Kant, grounds moral requirements in social agreements made for the sake of mutual advantage. Rawls presents a novel social contract theory, which has two main parts. The first part of the theory identifies the correct principles of justice as those "that free and rational persons concerned to further their own interests would accept in an initial position of equality as defining the fundamental terms of their association." To ensure that the principles selected by contractors are fair, Rawls imposes a crucial restriction on the "original position" from which the contractors select principles. In Rawls's theory, the correct principles of justice are those that would be chosen from behind a veil of ignorance, whereby individuals are stripped of any particular knowledge about themselves, their social position, or their conception of the good. In putting forward this idea of the original position, Rawls claims that he is simply making vivid "the restrictions that it seems reasonable to impose on arguments for the principles of justice."
Rawls maintains that contractors in the original position would agree on two principles of justice. First, "each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others." Second, "social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone's advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all." The first of these principles is lexically prior to the second - i.e., the first principle (concerning liberty) trumps the second (concerning inequality) . The guiding thought behind the two principles, Rawls claims, is that inequalities can be just only when they benefit the least advantaged members of society. Rawls points out that his theory thus differs sharply from utilitarianism, according to which we ought to maximize well-being, and shares commonalities with Kant's moral philosophy.
-Rawls conceives of the parties in the original position as:
Pixels
The smallest unit of an image displayed on a digital screen, representing a single point of color.
Display
An electronic device that visually presents text, images, or video for the user, using technologies like LCD, LED, or OLED.
Tablet Computers
Portable, flat computing devices equipped with a touch screen as the primary input device, designed for mobile internet browsing, multimedia consumption, and application use.
Apple iPad
A line of tablet computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc., which run the iOS and iPadOS mobile operating systems.
Q1: Midgley claims moral reasoning requires the possibility
Q6: In Nietzsche's view, Christian morality must be:<br>A)
Q7: Mackie claims that subjectivism is:<br>A) a linguistic
Q8: Kant claims that an act has moral
Q12: According to Foot, all categorical imperatives automatically
Q16: According to Herman's interpretation of Kant, an
Q21: According to Ayer, all ethical concepts are
Q22: According to Annas, the appeal of the
Q22: Wolf claims we must resort to intuition
Q29: According to Kant, morality requires us to:<br>A)