Examlex
David Gauthier: Why Contractarianism?
Gauthier begins by claiming that morality faces a foundational crisis: morality's supposed authority depends on a worldview we no longer accept - one according to which the world is purposively ordered. Because of this, there is a serious question as to why we should accept the constraints of morality, given that these constraints purport to be independent of our desires and interests. This question becomes particularly pressing when obeying the dictates of morality would require sacrificing our interests for the sake of someone or something that we do not personally care about.
Some respond to this challenge by claiming that morality needs no justification. Gauthier claims that such a vindication is necessary, however. And we have an alternative method for justifying our actions that makes no reference to moral considerations. This method is that of deliberative justification, according to which an action is justified if and only if it maximizes the agent's expected utility (where utility is understood in terms of considered preferences). Even if we were to do away with morality, we could still justify our actions via deliberative rationality.
Gauthier claims that there are three possible ways for morality to survive the challenge he has raised. One could argue that (i) we must postulate moral facts to explain our experiences, or (ii) one could argue that deliberative justification is somehow incomplete, or (iii) one could try to locate morality within the framework of deliberative rationality. Gauthier embraces the third way of resolving the crisis. He conceives of morality as a set of rules that constrain people's behavior, but that are mutually agreed on because they are to everyone's advantage. Because we gain more than we lose by submitting to such rules, deliberative rationality councils us to accept them.
-Although Gauthier claims that morality faces a foundational crisis, some claim that morality needs no justification. How does Gauthier respond to this claim? Do you find his argument convincing? Why or why not?
Ladder Logic
A graphical programming language used to develop software for industrial control systems, resembling the schematic diagrams of relay logic hardware.
PLC Power Supply
Provides the necessary electrical power for a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) to operate.
Backplane
A circuit board containing slots for integrated circuits and connectors, serving as the backbone for connecting modules in computer systems.
PLC Software
Computer programs specifically designed to create, simulate, and implement control algorithms for Programmable Logic Controllers.
Q1: Annas argues the main appeal of the
Q3: Sartre claims that according to existentialism, there
Q4: Wolf refers to the point of view
Q10: According to Sidwick moral judgments express:<br>A) self-evident
Q14: Rawls claims that when his two principles
Q15: Explain Mackie's distinction between "first order" and
Q16: Annas claims that learning to be moral
Q23: According to Dewey, valuations require statement in
Q25: Mackie intends for his moral skepticism to
Q30: In explaining existentialism, Sartre invokes several slogans.