Examlex
David Gauthier: Why Contractarianism?
Gauthier begins by claiming that morality faces a foundational crisis: morality's supposed authority depends on a worldview we no longer accept - one according to which the world is purposively ordered. Because of this, there is a serious question as to why we should accept the constraints of morality, given that these constraints purport to be independent of our desires and interests. This question becomes particularly pressing when obeying the dictates of morality would require sacrificing our interests for the sake of someone or something that we do not personally care about.
Some respond to this challenge by claiming that morality needs no justification. Gauthier claims that such a vindication is necessary, however. And we have an alternative method for justifying our actions that makes no reference to moral considerations. This method is that of deliberative justification, according to which an action is justified if and only if it maximizes the agent's expected utility (where utility is understood in terms of considered preferences) . Even if we were to do away with morality, we could still justify our actions via deliberative rationality.
Gauthier claims that there are three possible ways for morality to survive the challenge he has raised. One could argue that (i) we must postulate moral facts to explain our experiences, or (ii) one could argue that deliberative justification is somehow incomplete, or (iii) one could try to locate morality within the framework of deliberative rationality. Gauthier embraces the third way of resolving the crisis. He conceives of morality as a set of rules that constrain people's behavior, but that are mutually agreed on because they are to everyone's advantage. Because we gain more than we lose by submitting to such rules, deliberative rationality councils us to accept them.
-Gauthier defines "utility" as:
Diffuse Feeling States
Broad, often unclear emotional experiences that lack a specific, identifiable cause and can influence mood and behavior.
Long-lasting
Refers to something that endures or continues over a significant period, showing durability or permanence.
Low Intensity
Referring to activities or situations that require a minimal amount of energy, effort, or concentration.
Emotion
An intricate mental state characterized by a personal experience, a bodily reaction, and a response shown through behavior or expression.
Q5: Harman claims that when we judge something
Q5: According to Stevenson, traditional interest theories fail
Q6: Hume claims it is inexplicable how one
Q8: According to Ross, hedonistic utilitarianism is committed
Q11: Interest theories of the good define goodness
Q19: Midgley maintains that moral isolationism would lay
Q21: According to Prichard, we can know that
Q21: Gauthier claims that the foundational crisis of
Q29: Sinnott-Armstrong maintains that his list of "principles
Q30: According to Arpaly, agents are no less