Examlex
David Gauthier: Why Contractarianism?
Gauthier begins by claiming that morality faces a foundational crisis: morality's supposed authority depends on a worldview we no longer accept - one according to which the world is purposively ordered. Because of this, there is a serious question as to why we should accept the constraints of morality, given that these constraints purport to be independent of our desires and interests. This question becomes particularly pressing when obeying the dictates of morality would require sacrificing our interests for the sake of someone or something that we do not personally care about.
Some respond to this challenge by claiming that morality needs no justification. Gauthier claims that such a vindication is necessary, however. And we have an alternative method for justifying our actions that makes no reference to moral considerations. This method is that of deliberative justification, according to which an action is justified if and only if it maximizes the agent's expected utility (where utility is understood in terms of considered preferences) . Even if we were to do away with morality, we could still justify our actions via deliberative rationality.
Gauthier claims that there are three possible ways for morality to survive the challenge he has raised. One could argue that (i) we must postulate moral facts to explain our experiences, or (ii) one could argue that deliberative justification is somehow incomplete, or (iii) one could try to locate morality within the framework of deliberative rationality. Gauthier embraces the third way of resolving the crisis. He conceives of morality as a set of rules that constrain people's behavior, but that are mutually agreed on because they are to everyone's advantage. Because we gain more than we lose by submitting to such rules, deliberative rationality councils us to accept them.
-Gauthier describes his identification of morality with the agreements of rational persons as:
Modern Countries
Nations that are characterized by developed economies, technological advancement, and contemporary social structures.
Maturation
The process of development in which an individual matures or reaches full functionality, often referring to physical, psychological, or emotional development.
Active Alertness
A state of being keenly aware and ready to engage, often associated with the ability to respond quickly to stimuli or situations.
Arousal
A physiological and psychological state of being awoken or stimulated to action, often associated with heightened activity in the autonomic nervous system.
Q2: Anscombe claims that Aristotelian ethics deals with
Q7: In Stevenson's view, ethical disagreements are disagreements
Q8: Mackie's "patterns of objectification" are an attempt
Q12: Impersonal reasons, according to Scanlon, do not
Q14: Kant claims that acting (as opposed to
Q15: According to Annas, becoming more fully virtuous
Q17: According to Arpaly's analysis, agents are deficient
Q23: What is a prima facie duty, and
Q26: Anscombe claims that the expression morally ought
Q29: The principle of utility approves of actions