Examlex
David Gauthier: Why Contractarianism?
Gauthier begins by claiming that morality faces a foundational crisis: morality's supposed authority depends on a worldview we no longer accept - one according to which the world is purposively ordered. Because of this, there is a serious question as to why we should accept the constraints of morality, given that these constraints purport to be independent of our desires and interests. This question becomes particularly pressing when obeying the dictates of morality would require sacrificing our interests for the sake of someone or something that we do not personally care about.
Some respond to this challenge by claiming that morality needs no justification. Gauthier claims that such a vindication is necessary, however. And we have an alternative method for justifying our actions that makes no reference to moral considerations. This method is that of deliberative justification, according to which an action is justified if and only if it maximizes the agent's expected utility (where utility is understood in terms of considered preferences). Even if we were to do away with morality, we could still justify our actions via deliberative rationality.
Gauthier claims that there are three possible ways for morality to survive the challenge he has raised. One could argue that (i) we must postulate moral facts to explain our experiences, or (ii) one could argue that deliberative justification is somehow incomplete, or (iii) one could try to locate morality within the framework of deliberative rationality. Gauthier embraces the third way of resolving the crisis. He conceives of morality as a set of rules that constrain people's behavior, but that are mutually agreed on because they are to everyone's advantage. Because we gain more than we lose by submitting to such rules, deliberative rationality councils us to accept them.
-Pareto-optimality obtains when no one could do better without someone else doing worse.
Client-centered Therapist
A psychological therapist who employs a humanistic approach focusing on respecting and accepting the client's perspective as central in therapy.
Subjective Experiences
Subjective experiences are internally felt states or perceptions unique to an individual, which are influenced by personal opinions, feelings, and biases, and cannot be directly measured or observed by others.
Client-centered Therapists
Therapists who employ a humanistic approach focusing on creating a supportive, non-judgmental environment, allowing clients to lead the therapy process and discover their own solutions.
Carl Rogers
An influential American psychologist who developed the client-centered therapy approach, emphasizing the humanistic perspective in psychology.
Q1: What does it mean to give a
Q5: Sidwick claims that utilitarianism largely conflicts with
Q5: Foot conceives of rationality as essentially involving:<br>A)
Q10: Sinnott-Armstrong claims that the following principle explains
Q11: Explain Prichard's analogy between Moral Philosophy and
Q11: According to Sidwick, the strict impartiality of
Q18: Explain Williams's distinction between internal and external
Q20: Ross claims, "There is therefore much truth
Q26: According to Mill, questions of ultimate ends
Q29: What is moral nihilism? What two versions