Examlex
Christine Korsgaard: Skepticism About Practical Reason
Kant's ethical theory attempts to base morality on practical reason, but many thinkers have been skeptical about the extent to which human action is or could be directed by reason. Korsgaard distinguishes between content skepticism, which involves doubts about whether formal principles of rationality can provide any substantive moral guidance, and motivational skepticism, which involves doubts about the ability of reason to serve as a motive. Korsgaard argues that motivational skepticism is always based on content skepticism, and hence cannot provide an independent argument against a moral theory based on practical reason.
Korsgaard begins by discussing Hume's skeptical view of practical reason, according to which "reason is, and ought to be only the slave of the passions." On Hume's view, reason neither selects nor ranks our ends, but merely allows us to determine the most efficient means to our ends, which are themselves set by our desires. Practical irrationality occurs, on Hume's view, only when our desires are somehow based on false beliefs. Korsgaard argues, however, for the possibility of pure irrationality-cases in which we fail to respond appropriately to an available reason, as when one sees that one's ends can only be achieved by certain means, but fails to take those means. Despite the fact that reason and motivation can come apart, however, Korsgaard holds that the two are tightly linked. She endorses the internalist requirement, according to which one can only have a reason for action if that reason is capable of motivating a rational person. Because we sometimes fail to be rational, we can sometimes fail to be motivated by our reasons. But Korsgaard insists that human beings are capable of being rational, especially given the right sort of training. Accordingly, Korsgaard claims that if there are any unconditional requirements of reason (as Kant claimed) , then humans are capable of responding to them, even if they sometimes fail to do so. If so, motivational skepticism is correct only if content skepticism is correct. The former cannot float free from the latter.
-Korsgaard claims that the internalism requirement:
Sigmund Freud
The pioneer of psychoanalysis, known for his theory of the unconscious mind and mechanisms of repression.
Austrian Physician
A reference to a medical doctor from Austria, often associated with notable figures in psychology and psychiatry such as Sigmund Freud.
Functionalism
A school of psychology that focuses on how mental and behavioral processes function and enable an organism to adapt, survive, and flourish.
Psychological Approach
A perspective in psychology that emphasizes understanding mental processes, behavior, and development through various theories and techniques.
Q1: What does Moore claim is "the most
Q9: What is "the point of view of
Q15: According to Arpaly's analysis, Huckleberry Finn's actions
Q17: Held argues that the very center of
Q18: Stevenson's primary aim is to:<br>A) provide an
Q21: Stevenson claims that the primary use of
Q25: Stevenson claims that ethical terms are instruments
Q26: Gauthier claims that there is nothing for
Q28: What does Marquis claim is the standard
Q32: How does Prichard think we can come