Examlex
Thomas Nagel: Moral Luck
Intuitively, people should not be condemned for things that are due to factors beyond their control. Nagel argues, however, that there seem to be many instances of moral luck. Cases of moral luck occur when what someone does depends on factors beyond her control, yet we continue to treat her as the proper object of moral assessment. For example, we condemn the drunk driver who hits a pedestrian far more harshly than the one who merely drives off the road, even though the fact of whether a pedestrian is present is beyond the driver's control.
Nagel distinguishes among four different sources of moral luck. Constitutive luck concerns what kind of person one is, in terms of one's inclinations and temperament. Another category of luck - circumstantial luck - encompasses the circumstances one happens to be in, and the kinds of problems one faces. A third kind of luck - causal luck - concerns how one is determined by antecedent circumstances. And a final kind of luck - resultant luck - deals with the consequences of one's actions and projects, like the case of our drunk driver.
When we take all four of these types of luck into account, Nagel argues, "nothing or almost nothing about what a person does seems to be under his control." Yet, we continue morally judging people for their actions. Nagel argues that this paradox arises from our concepts of agency and events. On the one hand, the idea that we are agents is incompatible with the view that we are mere things, and that our actions are mere events. Yet, as we learn more about the causes of our actions and their consequences, we seem forced to accept the view that we are indeed things and our actions are events. Nonetheless, Nagel claims that we can't help but feel moral emotions like pride and guilt about our own actions. Ultimately, Nagel concludes, the problem of moral luck does not admit of a satisfactory solution; it is the irreconcilable clash of the objective and subjective points of view
-Nagel claims that prior to reflection, it seems that people cannot be morally assessed for:
Downdropped
Referring to a section of the Earth's crust that has moved downward in relation to adjacent sections, often due to faulting.
Uplifted
Uplifted refers to regions of the Earth's crust that have been raised due to tectonic activities, such as earthquakes or mountain-building processes, altering the landscape and geology.
Glacier
A large, slow-moving mass of ice formed by the compaction and crystallization of snow, found in cold regions and high altitudes.
Tsunami
A large, long high sea wave caused by underwater earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, or landslides.
Q1: In Hare's view, moral judgments are deducible
Q3: Sartre claims that according to existentialism, there
Q6: Despite its rejection of aggregation, Scanlon claims
Q9: Stevenson argues that any adequate philosophical account
Q11: According to Foot, people may follow either
Q13: Explain Harman's two cases of the physicist
Q14: Rachels maintains that advocating one thing but
Q17: Smart claims that restricted utilitarianism:<br>A) tests individual
Q19: Behind the veil of ignorance, people have
Q20: Anscombe claims that in the absence of