Examlex
Thomas Nagel: Moral Luck
Intuitively, people should not be condemned for things that are due to factors beyond their control. Nagel argues, however, that there seem to be many instances of moral luck. Cases of moral luck occur when what someone does depends on factors beyond her control, yet we continue to treat her as the proper object of moral assessment. For example, we condemn the drunk driver who hits a pedestrian far more harshly than the one who merely drives off the road, even though the fact of whether a pedestrian is present is beyond the driver's control.
Nagel distinguishes among four different sources of moral luck. Constitutive luck concerns what kind of person one is, in terms of one's inclinations and temperament. Another category of luck - circumstantial luck - encompasses the circumstances one happens to be in, and the kinds of problems one faces. A third kind of luck - causal luck - concerns how one is determined by antecedent circumstances. And a final kind of luck - resultant luck - deals with the consequences of one's actions and projects, like the case of our drunk driver.
When we take all four of these types of luck into account, Nagel argues, "nothing or almost nothing about what a person does seems to be under his control." Yet, we continue morally judging people for their actions. Nagel argues that this paradox arises from our concepts of agency and events. On the one hand, the idea that we are agents is incompatible with the view that we are mere things, and that our actions are mere events. Yet, as we learn more about the causes of our actions and their consequences, we seem forced to accept the view that we are indeed things and our actions are events. Nonetheless, Nagel claims that we can't help but feel moral emotions like pride and guilt about our own actions. Ultimately, Nagel concludes, the problem of moral luck does not admit of a satisfactory solution; it is the irreconcilable clash of the objective and subjective points of view
-Nagel claims that the idea of agency is incompatible with actions being events.
Scrotal Skin
The thin, external skin that covers the scrotum, which is the pouch that contains and protects the testicles, regulating their temperature for proper sperm production.
Frenulum
A small fold of tissue that secures or restricts the motion of a mobile organ in the body.
Glans
The sensitive bulbous structure at the distal end of the penis or clitoris, playing a significant role in sexual pleasure.
Foreskin
The retractable fold of skin that covers the glans of the penis in uncircumcised males.
Q3: Rawls follows economic theory and defines "rationality"
Q6: According to Korsgaard, what is the relationship
Q13: Timmerman claims that Singer fails to provide
Q16: Gauthier claims that moral language fits a
Q19: Sinnott-Armstrong claims that moral sense theorists assimilate
Q21: According to Williams, utilitarians should regard the
Q26: What objections does Korsgaard raise to Hume's
Q27: According to Gauthier, the capacity for semantic
Q30: Smart claims that if restricted utilitarianism introduces
Q31: Mackie's moral skepticism is a linguistic thesis