Examlex
G. E. M. Anscombe: Modern Moral Philosophy
Anscombe argues that the moral philosophy of the past several hundred years has rested on serious confusions, so much so that it is not currently profitable to do moral philosophy. She begins by providing brief critiques of a number of important moral philosophers, including Butler, Hume, Kant, Bentham, and Mill. Although she raises different objections for each of these views, she claims that a common problem for all modern moral theories is that they invoke the concept of moral obligation. Anscombe points out that ancient philosophers such as Aristotle had no such concept, and argues that the concept is one we inherited from the divine law conception of ethics prevalent in Christianity. Anscombe notes that without this foundation (which is no longer endorsed by most moral philosophers) , talk of moral obligations retains some psychological effect, but no longer picks out a coherent concept. Instead of basing our ethical theories on the notion of moral obligation, Anscombe recommends a return to the ancient approach of thinking about the virtues. Even in the absence of divine law, we can still sensibly describe actions as untruthful or unjust. This approach, however, must wait until we have an adequate philosophy of psychology, which tells us what makes certain traits virtues, which itself will require analyzing related concepts such as action, intention, and pleasure.
Anscombe also criticizes the British moral philosophy of her time. She claims that every British moral philosopher since Sidgwick has denied that there are certain actions that can never be right, regardless of their consequences. Against this, Anscombe claims that it is always forbidden to kill an innocent person, even if doing so would bring about good consequences - e.g., by saving several others. The plausibility of absolutism thus gives us another good reason to adopt a virtue-based account of ethics: Although someone might claim that it is sometimes morally right to kill an innocent person, no one would deny that it is unjust to do so.
-According to Anscombe, Aristotelian ethics contrasts with modern moral philosophy because Aristotle seems to lack a concept of:
Children's Recollections
The process through which children remember and recount past experiences or events.
Sexual Abuse
Inappropriate or coercive sexual behavior towards another individual without consent, often resulting in significant harm and trauma.
Interference
A cognitive process that impedes the ability to learn or remember information because of previously learned material or future learning.
Study Times
Periods allocated for learning or acquiring knowledge on specific subjects or skills.
Q2: Ayer rejects the subjectivist view that a
Q3: According to Wolf, a moral theory that
Q15: What is a Good Samaritan, according to
Q16: Ayer criticizes intuition as a source of
Q17: Gauthier objects to Hume's characterization of morality
Q20: Ayer claims that "a strictly philosophical treatise
Q22: Critically examine Gauthier's conception of "deliberative rationality."
Q26: According to Ross, the main issue between
Q28: According to Stevenson, disagreement in interest may
Q32: Harman claims that the Open Question Argument:<br>A)