Examlex
Virginia Held: Feminist Transformations of Moral Theory
Held argues that the history of moral philosophy is deeply infected by male bias, so much so that even the main concepts of the discipline reflect a lack of respect for women's experiences. In particular, Held discusses three broad ideas in moral philosophy that she finds particularly problematic from a feminist perspective. The first is the traditional conception of the relationship between reason and emotion. Many philosophers have held that reason should play a primary role in ethics, either by discovering universal moral principles, or impartially calculating the costs and benefits of various actions. Against this, Held argues for giving the emotions a prominent role in our moral lives, especially the emotions of care that accompany close relationships.
Second, Held criticizes the traditional interpretation of the distinction between the public and the private. On this conception, "the public realm is seen as the distinctively human realm in which man transcends his animal nature, while the private realm of the household is seen as the natural region in which women merely reproduce the species." Held objects to this conception, and argues that motherhood equally "transcends animal nature," especially insofar as it involves helping children to develop as moral beings. Held finds the relationship of care implicit in motherhood to be of particular moral importance, and regards traditional moral philosophy as deficient for neglecting it.
Finally, Held critiques the common conception of the self as a rational individual, independent and largely self-interested. She argues that close attention to the experiences of women yields a conception of the self as deeply enmeshed in particular relationships in which self-interest and altruism are no longer easy to distinguish. Given these three instances of male bias, Held argues, moral philosophy is in need of a radical transformation to take adequate account of the experiences of women.
-Held claims that Hobbes's view of the self is inadequate because it is too:
Ultimate Attribution Error
A perceptual bias occurring in intergroup relations. Negative behaviors by out-group members are attributed to stable, internal factors such as undesirable personal traits or dispositions, but positive behaviors by out-group members are attributed to unstable, external factors such as situational pressures or luck. As a result, in-group observers will blame the out-group for negative outcomes but will not give it credit for positive outcomes.
Out-group Homogeneity
The perception that members of a group different from ours are more similar to each other than they actually are, often leading to stereotyping.
Goal Isomorphism
In groups, a state in which group goals and individual goals held by a member are similar in the sense that actions leading to the attainment of group goals also lead simultaneously to the attainment of individual goals.
Primary Groups
Social groups characterized by close, personal, and enduring relationships, often playing a critical role in socialization.
Q5: Wolf-Devine claims that affirmative action has the
Q5: According to Nagel, our beliefs are always
Q10: According to Anscombe, someone who thinks it
Q11: Unlike utilitarianism, contractualism denies that considerations of
Q12: According to Marquis, cruelty to animals is
Q14: Singer claims that his principle is unprecedented
Q18: According to Harman, it is a factual
Q18: What is the point of the case
Q20: Anscombe claims that in the absence of
Q20: Annas claims that the possibility of a