Examlex
James Rachels: Egoism and Moral Skepticism
Psychological Egoism states an empirical fact, namely, that persons ultimately aim at their own good. Ethical Egoism, by contrast, makes a normative claim: the right act is the act that produces the most good for the agent. Rachels examines psychological and ethical egoism, and finds both untenable.
Rachels argues that psychological egoism rests on a number of confusions. Psychological egoists often point out that we only act in ways that seem to serve our own self-interest. Rachels argues, however, that this mistakes the obvious claim that voluntary acts are mine, with the controversial claim that the object of my acts - i.e., what ends my actions aim at - is myself. Selfishness should not be confused with self-interest. Psychological egoists also attempt to support their view by claiming that unselfish-looking actions always produce a sense of self-satisfaction in the agent. But this, Rachels claims, confuses feeling good after doing an action with doing the action because it feels good. Once these confusions are cleared up, psychological egoism is easy to resist.
Rachels notes that ethical egoism, properly interpreted, is a coherent position. Nevertheless, he argues, the rationale ethical egoism's supplies to reach moral verdicts is implausible. Is it really the case that the explanation for why I shouldn't set fire to the local department store is my own self-interest? Isn't the more reasonable answer, Rachels queries, that I shouldn't start the fire because people will be burned to death? Given that most of us intrinsically value other persons' welfare, and this is incompatible with ethical egoism, ethical egoism should be abandoned.
-Rachels argues that if someone desires the welfare and happiness of another person, this does not mean that this satisfaction is the object of his desire.
Framing
The perspective or angle from which a narrative, issue, or situation is presented and perceived, often influencing the interpretation and response of the audience.
Attitudes
A settled way of thinking or feeling about someone or something, typically reflected in a person's behavior.
Decisions
The process of making choices or conclusions after considering various alternatives and their potential outcomes.
Aphasia
A condition characterized by the loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage.
Q5: Korsgaard's "internalist requirement" states that:<br>A) practical reasons
Q5: According to Wolf, the moral point of
Q14: According to Nagel, betrayal is bad because
Q16: According to Taylor, the life of Sisyphus
Q20: What is the Open Question Argument, and
Q24: Petrochemical plants pollute the air:<br>A) directly, by
Q25: According to Korsgaard, Hume believed that the
Q27: Anscombe recommends that we stop using the
Q28: Thomson claims that we can solve the
Q32: According to Wolf-Devine, the number of women