James Rachels: Active and Passive Euthanasia

question 12

Essay

James Rachels: Active and Passive Euthanasia
Active euthanasia is the intentional termination of a patient's life by another person, for the sake of relieving the pain and suffering of the patient. Passive euthanasia is the cessation of medical assistance needed to prolong a patient's life, again performed for the sake of relieving pain and suffering. The conventional doctrine in medical ethics is that whereas passive euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible, active euthanasia never is. Rachels argues that the conventional doctrine faces serious objections, and cannot be correct.
Rachels raises two objections to the conventional doctrine. The first is that the purpose of euthanasia is to alleviate pain and suffering, and in many cases active euthanasia can serve this function much more efficiently than passive euthanasia. Thus, if a decision has been made to employ euthanasia, active euthanasia is preferable to passive euthanasia. Rachels's second objection is that the conventional doctrine leads to decisions about life and death being made on morally irrelevant grounds. For example, passive euthanasia is sometimes employed on infants born with Down's syndrome who would require a simple surgery to survive. Such infants are allowed to die not because they require surgery, but because they have Down's syndrome. The decision to euthanize such infants depends on the irrelevant fact that they require a simple operation.
The acceptance of the conventional doctrine is often grounded in the view that killing is intrinsically worse than letting die. Against this, Rachels imagines two cases that are exactly alike in every respect, except that one involves killing and the other involves letting die. In the first case, Smith drowns his young cousin to gain his inheritance. In the second case, Jones, like Smith, intends to kill his young cousin, but ends up (because of a slippery bath tub) merely watching him drown. Rachels claims that the two men behave equally wrongly, and that this shows there is no morally relevant distinction between killing and letting die. The distinction between killing and letting die thus cannot be used to support the conventional doctrine
-What is the "conventional doctrine" regarding active and passive euthanasia? What reasons are typically given in support of this view? Do you think they are good reasons? Why or why not?

Distinguish between different types of arguments including restatements, popularity claims, hasty generalizations, false dilemmas, and ad hominem attacks.

Explain the relevance and impact of informational constraints on project completion.

Appreciate the role of adequate sample sizes in the persuasiveness of statistical evidence.

Outline the three essential elements of an argument.

---

Definitions:

Genre

A category used to classify a film in terms of certain general patterns of form and content. Initially used to describe the broad theatrical categories of tragedy and comedy, with regard to modern film, genre includes a wide range of types: westerns, horror and gangster films, science fiction, romantic comedy, etc.

Popular Literature

Popular Literature consists of written works that are widely read or consumed by the general public, typically characterized by their appeal to mass tastes rather than literary merit.

Lord of the Rings

A highly acclaimed fantasy novel series by J.R.R. Tolkien, which has been successfully adapted into a film trilogy directed by Peter Jackson, celebrated for its epic storytelling and visual effects.

Civil Rights

Refers to the rights of citizens to political and social freedom and equality, often associated with movements aiming to eliminate discrimination and provide equal opportunities for all individuals.