Examlex
James Rachels: Active and Passive Euthanasia
Active euthanasia is the intentional termination of a patient's life by another person, for the sake of relieving the pain and suffering of the patient. Passive euthanasia is the cessation of medical assistance needed to prolong a patient's life, again performed for the sake of relieving pain and suffering. The conventional doctrine in medical ethics is that whereas passive euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible, active euthanasia never is. Rachels argues that the conventional doctrine faces serious objections, and cannot be correct.
Rachels raises two objections to the conventional doctrine. The first is that the purpose of euthanasia is to alleviate pain and suffering, and in many cases active euthanasia can serve this function much more efficiently than passive euthanasia. Thus, if a decision has been made to employ euthanasia, active euthanasia is preferable to passive euthanasia. Rachels's second objection is that the conventional doctrine leads to decisions about life and death being made on morally irrelevant grounds. For example, passive euthanasia is sometimes employed on infants born with Down's syndrome who would require a simple surgery to survive. Such infants are allowed to die not because they require surgery, but because they have Down's syndrome. The decision to euthanize such infants depends on the irrelevant fact that they require a simple operation.
The acceptance of the conventional doctrine is often grounded in the view that killing is intrinsically worse than letting die. Against this, Rachels imagines two cases that are exactly alike in every respect, except that one involves killing and the other involves letting die. In the first case, Smith drowns his young cousin to gain his inheritance. In the second case, Jones, like Smith, intends to kill his young cousin, but ends up (because of a slippery bath tub) merely watching him drown. Rachels claims that the two men behave equally wrongly, and that this shows there is no morally relevant distinction between killing and letting die. The distinction between killing and letting die thus cannot be used to support the conventional doctrine
-According to Rachels, many people view killing to be, in itself, morally worse than letting die because:
Prescriptive Nature
The inherent quality of providing guidance or rules on actions and behaviors that should be followed to achieve desired outcomes.
Adaptive Leadership
A style of leadership that encourages leaders to respond and adjust to changes by being flexible, experimental, and innovative.
Leader Behaviors
Patterns or actions adopted by leaders that influence the morale, performance, and satisfaction of their team members.
Adaptive Challenge
A problem or situation that requires new learning and innovative solutions, often complex and not easily addressed through existing procedures or methods.
Q1: According to Thomas, non-verbal behavior can belie
Q7: What is Thomson's solution to the trolley
Q13: According to Arpaly, the degree to which
Q16: Shue argues that flat rate payment systems:<br>A)
Q16: Despite their treatment of farm animals, factory
Q17: According to Singer's view, the "Drowning Child"
Q17: According to Mackie, the best explanation for
Q21: Singer argues that we all ought to
Q26: Sartre claims that there is no such
Q27: What is Nagel's explanation of why we