Examlex
James Rachels: Active and Passive Euthanasia
Active euthanasia is the intentional termination of a patient's life by another person, for the sake of relieving the pain and suffering of the patient. Passive euthanasia is the cessation of medical assistance needed to prolong a patient's life, again performed for the sake of relieving pain and suffering. The conventional doctrine in medical ethics is that whereas passive euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible, active euthanasia never is. Rachels argues that the conventional doctrine faces serious objections, and cannot be correct.
Rachels raises two objections to the conventional doctrine. The first is that the purpose of euthanasia is to alleviate pain and suffering, and in many cases active euthanasia can serve this function much more efficiently than passive euthanasia. Thus, if a decision has been made to employ euthanasia, active euthanasia is preferable to passive euthanasia. Rachels's second objection is that the conventional doctrine leads to decisions about life and death being made on morally irrelevant grounds. For example, passive euthanasia is sometimes employed on infants born with Down's syndrome who would require a simple surgery to survive. Such infants are allowed to die not because they require surgery, but because they have Down's syndrome. The decision to euthanize such infants depends on the irrelevant fact that they require a simple operation.
The acceptance of the conventional doctrine is often grounded in the view that killing is intrinsically worse than letting die. Against this, Rachels imagines two cases that are exactly alike in every respect, except that one involves killing and the other involves letting die. In the first case, Smith drowns his young cousin to gain his inheritance. In the second case, Jones, like Smith, intends to kill his young cousin, but ends up (because of a slippery bath tub) merely watching him drown. Rachels claims that the two men behave equally wrongly, and that this shows there is no morally relevant distinction between killing and letting die. The distinction between killing and letting die thus cannot be used to support the conventional doctrine
-Rachels claims that:
Intrinsic Motives
The drive to engage in activities for their own sake, for the enjoyment or challenge they provide, rather than for some external reward.
Work Ethic
A set of values centered on the importance of hard work and diligence, often associated with a positive attitude towards labor and a commitment to achieving task-related goals.
Career Development
A lifelong process of learning and work-related activities intended to bring about a fulfilling career path.
Intrinsic Reasons
Motivations that come from within an individual, such as personal satisfaction or enjoyment.
Q6: Thomson claims that we can solve the
Q9: Davis claims that sexual harassment harms not
Q10: Do any of the issues Regan raises
Q11: Moral luck is when:<br>A) a morally good
Q12: According to Nagel, when it comes to
Q13: Is it important that animal species are
Q17: Held argues that the very center of
Q20: What two kinds of existentialism does Sartre
Q22: Anscombe claims that "the differences between the
Q28: According to Foot, if one is faced