Examlex
Karen Hanson: Facing Facts and Responsibilities
According to Karen Hanson in "Facing Facts and Responsibilities," a central problem in the debate over affirmative action is the lack of consensus over where the burden of proof should lie. Given the under-representation of women and minorities in academia, is it up to those who oppose affirmative action to demonstrate that current hiring practices work fairly and ensure equal opportunity for all? Or is it the responsibility of affirmative action advocates to identify specific ways in which gender and racial biases infect hiring procedures, even those claiming to be gender and race-blind? Hanson's answer is that we are not entitled to assume hiring practices are unproblematic until proven otherwise because it is unreasonable to think academics are free from the racism and sexism that remains pervasive throughout society. After all, academics live in that society as well and academic training and allegiance to meritocratic ideals have not shown themselves to be any barrier to unjust discrimination in the past. Thus according to Hanson, the burden should lie with opponents of affirmative action.
Hanson also addresses two concerns commonly expressed by opponents of affirmative action: first, that affirmative action ignores social disadvantages suffered by individuals outside historically marginalized groups; and secondly, that affirmative action may create new forms of injustice by unfairly depriving white men of opportunities and stigmatizing women and minorities. Regarding the first worry, Hanson notes that attending to one form of injustice does not entail ignoring or denying that other forms exist. And the mere fact that other forms of injustice exist does not undercut the case for affirmative unless it could somehow be shown that affirmative action policies exacerbate those other injustices. Regarding the second worry, Hanson admits that affirmative action policies are not immune in principle from creating unjust outcomes for individuals outside historically marginalized groups. But Hanson argues that the onus is on critics of affirmative action to show when and how this is the case. Furthermore, Hanson does not take concerns about stigmatization seriously, since it is unclear to her how much preferential hiring procedures could increase the stigmatization already created by decades of sexism and racism, especially in light of the fact that many white men have enjoyed various forms of preferential treatment and suffered no appreciable stigmatization as a result.
-According to Hanson, it is unreasonable to think academics are free of gender and racial bias because:
BioPac
A brand known for developing biophysical research and education equipment, typically used for measuring physiological signals.
Human Brain Waves
Human brain waves are patterns of electrical activity in the brain that are indicative of various states of consciousness or cognitive processes.
Electrodes
Conductive mediums that transfer electrical charge to another medium.
Meninges
The three layers of protective tissue that cover the brain and spinal cord, comprising the dura mater, arachnoid mater, and pia mater.
Q2: According to Timmerman, there is reason to
Q8: Thomson argues that the difference between Bystander
Q13: One reason for not imposing the death
Q14: According to Regan, the inefficiency of factory
Q18: Wolf-Devine argues that in debates over affirmative
Q21: Sinnott-Armstrong cites a number of psychological studies.
Q22: According to Taylor, the point of a
Q25: Harman claims that extreme nihilism is difficult
Q29: According to Hanson, affirmative action can generate
Q44: ) Any event that causes stress<br>A)Homeostasis<br>B)Stress response<br>C)Stress<br>D)Eustress<br>E)Distress<br>F)Stressor<br>