Examlex
Laurence Thomas: What Good Am I?
In "What Good Am I?" Laurence Thomas addresses the debate over affirmative action by asking why, given that knowledge is colorblind, the race and gender of professors should matter. What, in other words, is the benefit of a diverse professoriate? One answer is that a diverse professoriate provides role models for minority and female students. Thomas, however, rejects this answer because it is often presented in a way that suggests minority and female faculty have little to teach students from outside historically marginalized groups apart from how not to be racist and/or sexist. But even if this so-called role-model argument were innocent of such a suggestion, Thomas claims many would still object to affirmative action on the alleged grounds that affirmative action appointments are, by definition, not the best qualified applicants. After all, so the objection goes, if a job candidate were the most qualified applicant, he or she would not need any form of preferential treatment. According to Thomas, however, this objection completely ignores the existence the entrenched biases, which can persist even alongside a sincere belief in equality. In a morally perfect world free of these kinds of biases, women and minorities of superior qualifications would be hired on the basis of their merits. But that is not the kind of world we live in according to Thomas.
For Thomas, the best way to understand the benefit of a diverse faculty is in terms of intellectual affirmation, trust, and gratitude. Teaching, on Thomas's view, involves more than the mere transmission of knowledge. Crucially, it also involves providing intellectual affirmation, which is impossible in the absence of trust between student and teacher. Given that sexism and racism can make it difficult for female and minority students to develop this kind of trust with white male professors, a diverse faculty helps remove one obstacle standing in the way of some students achieving intellectual affirmation. Moreover, the mere presence of a diverse faculty can give female and minority students hope that the university is an environment where intellectual affirmation is possible for them. Finally, Thomas argues that intellectual affirmation creates gratitude, which when felt by white male students toward female and minority professors can help undermine academic "ole boy" networks that have served sexist and racist ends in the past.
-Thomas does not advocate for the representation of given viewpoints because he believes:
Stock Dividend
A dividend payment made in the form of additional shares rather than a cash payout, to shareholders.
Dividend
A portion of a company's earnings distributed to its shareholders, typically in the form of cash payments or additional shares.
Dividend Cuts
A reduction in the dividend payments issued by a company, which can signify financial distress or a reallocation of funds.
Debt-Equity Ratio
A measure of a company's financial leverage calculated by dividing its total liabilities by its shareholder equity.
Q2: The Roper v. Simmons Court found that
Q3: In 1989, Kevin Wiggins was convicted of
Q4: Singer invokes the principle that we morally
Q4: According to redefinitional naturalism:<br>A) ordinary moral claims
Q13: Wolf-Devine claims that proportional representation is not
Q20: Singer claims that we are required to
Q20: Wolf-Devine argues that women are not proportionately
Q25: Marquis argues that killing is wrong primarily
Q25: The eligibility function:<br>A) Serves to guide the
Q31: According to Foot, the crucial moral distinction