Examlex
Laurence Thomas: What Good Am I?
In "What Good Am I?" Laurence Thomas addresses the debate over affirmative action by asking why, given that knowledge is colorblind, the race and gender of professors should matter. What, in other words, is the benefit of a diverse professoriate? One answer is that a diverse professoriate provides role models for minority and female students. Thomas, however, rejects this answer because it is often presented in a way that suggests minority and female faculty have little to teach students from outside historically marginalized groups apart from how not to be racist and/or sexist. But even if this so-called role-model argument were innocent of such a suggestion, Thomas claims many would still object to affirmative action on the alleged grounds that affirmative action appointments are, by definition, not the best qualified applicants. After all, so the objection goes, if a job candidate were the most qualified applicant, he or she would not need any form of preferential treatment. According to Thomas, however, this objection completely ignores the existence the entrenched biases, which can persist even alongside a sincere belief in equality. In a morally perfect world free of these kinds of biases, women and minorities of superior qualifications would be hired on the basis of their merits. But that is not the kind of world we live in according to Thomas.
For Thomas, the best way to understand the benefit of a diverse faculty is in terms of intellectual affirmation, trust, and gratitude. Teaching, on Thomas's view, involves more than the mere transmission of knowledge. Crucially, it also involves providing intellectual affirmation, which is impossible in the absence of trust between student and teacher. Given that sexism and racism can make it difficult for female and minority students to develop this kind of trust with white male professors, a diverse faculty helps remove one obstacle standing in the way of some students achieving intellectual affirmation. Moreover, the mere presence of a diverse faculty can give female and minority students hope that the university is an environment where intellectual affirmation is possible for them. Finally, Thomas argues that intellectual affirmation creates gratitude, which when felt by white male students toward female and minority professors can help undermine academic "ole boy" networks that have served sexist and racist ends in the past.
-Thomas does not advocate for the representation of given viewpoints because he believes:
Consumer Protection
Laws and regulations designed to safeguard buyers of goods and services against unfair practices.
Legislative Changes
Amendments or enactments made to current laws by a legislative body.
Negotiable Instrument
A transferable document signed by the maker or drawer, promising to pay the holder a sum of money at a future date or on demand.
Contractual Rights
These are rights specifically granted to parties within a contract, allowing them to demand the performance of certain duties by others within the agreement.
Q6: According to Sinnott-Armstrong, a partial belief is
Q7: Despite his claim that human lives are
Q8: Wolf-Devine thinks that affirmative action has several
Q10: According to the text, the interpretation of
Q11: Thomson concludes that the trolley problem is
Q11: What is ethical naturalism? How would a
Q11: In Cronic, the Court considered five factors
Q12: Taylor defines meaninglessness as:<br>A) endless pointlessness.<br>B) endless
Q15: Rachels argues that if we have a
Q23: Midgley argues that it is impossible to