Examlex
Celia Wolf-Devine: Proportional Representation
In "Proportional Representation," Celia Wolf-Devine examines what she takes to be a basic presupposition of the debate over affirmative action: that the low percentage of women and minorities employed as college professors relative to their proportion in society as a whole is a problem in need of remedy. She presents two arguments for this claim and finds each of them wanting. According to the first argument, the under-representation of women and minorities in academia must, as a requirement of justice, be remedied because it is the result of discrimination. Wolf-Devine, however, argues that this under-representation can be reasonably explained by factors other than discrimination. For example, Wolf-Devine argues that there is no reason to suppose all racial and ethnic groups share an equally strong desire to pursue college teaching. On Wolf-Devine's view, different ethnic and racial groups have different ideas about what careers are most prestigious and worth pursuing. In addition, large numbers of racial and ethnic minorities have been scarred by the effects of poverty, which have created serious obstacles to entering college, let alone entering college teaching. And with respect to women, Wolf-Devine claims that their statistical under-representation may partly reflect personal preferences and choices-such as decisions to spend more time on childcare-rather than simply the operation of discriminatory hiring.
According to the second argument Wolf-Devine considers, college faculties should reduce the under-representation of women and minorities because of the benefit brought by the resulting increase in diversity. Given that intelligent dialogue is a vital part of the purpose of universities, Wolf-Devine accepts that intellectual diversity is beneficial. However, Wolf-Devine argues that gender and racial diversity does not guarantee intellectual diversity. In fact, gender and racial diversity is compatible with total ideological conformity in Wolf-Devine's view. Moreover, Wolf-Devine argues that we should not suppose that an individuals' gender or race indicates what beliefs or intellectual commitments they hold. Indeed, to do so is to engage in a demeaning form of stereotyping according to Wolf-Devine.
-Wolf-Devine examines a presupposition of the current affirmative action debate according to which:
Medial Geniculate Nucleus
A part of the thalamus in the brain involved in auditory processing and the relay of sound information from the ear to the auditory cortex.
Auditory System
The sensory system involved in the process of hearing, including the ears and the brain pathways that process sound.
Organ of Corti
The Organ of Corti is a structure located in the cochlea of the inner ear, responsible for converting sound vibration waves into electrical signals that can be interpreted by the brain as sound.
Inner Hair Cells
Sensory cells located in the cochlea of the inner ear, playing a crucial role in converting sound waves into nerve signals.
Q1: Held maintains that seeing women as emotional
Q2: According to Mackie, there is no objective
Q7: Jefferson v. Upton explored the question of
Q9: At least some people, Sinnott-Armstrong maintains, can
Q11: Thomson thinks that in the Bystander at
Q17: Thomson argues that we are not morally
Q20: Midgley claims that nobody can respect what
Q22: What is the counterfactual argument from qualifications
Q25: Singer claims that proximity does not make
Q25: In the Rescue I case, Foot claims