Examlex
Celia Wolf-Devine: Proportional Representation
In "Proportional Representation," Celia Wolf-Devine examines what she takes to be a basic presupposition of the debate over affirmative action: that the low percentage of women and minorities employed as college professors relative to their proportion in society as a whole is a problem in need of remedy. She presents two arguments for this claim and finds each of them wanting. According to the first argument, the under-representation of women and minorities in academia must, as a requirement of justice, be remedied because it is the result of discrimination. Wolf-Devine, however, argues that this under-representation can be reasonably explained by factors other than discrimination. For example, Wolf-Devine argues that there is no reason to suppose all racial and ethnic groups share an equally strong desire to pursue college teaching. On Wolf-Devine's view, different ethnic and racial groups have different ideas about what careers are most prestigious and worth pursuing. In addition, large numbers of racial and ethnic minorities have been scarred by the effects of poverty, which have created serious obstacles to entering college, let alone entering college teaching. And with respect to women, Wolf-Devine claims that their statistical under-representation may partly reflect personal preferences and choices-such as decisions to spend more time on childcare-rather than simply the operation of discriminatory hiring.
According to the second argument Wolf-Devine considers, college faculties should reduce the under-representation of women and minorities because of the benefit brought by the resulting increase in diversity. Given that intelligent dialogue is a vital part of the purpose of universities, Wolf-Devine accepts that intellectual diversity is beneficial. However, Wolf-Devine argues that gender and racial diversity does not guarantee intellectual diversity. In fact, gender and racial diversity is compatible with total ideological conformity in Wolf-Devine's view. Moreover, Wolf-Devine argues that we should not suppose that an individuals' gender or race indicates what beliefs or intellectual commitments they hold. Indeed, to do so is to engage in a demeaning form of stereotyping according to Wolf-Devine.
-Wolf-Devine argues that racial and ethnic minorities are not proportionately represented in academia because of:
Lobbying
The act of attempting to influence the decisions made by officials in the government, often conducted by lobbyists representing specific interests or organizations.
Nonprofits
Organizations designed primarily to provide social good rather than to make a profit, relying on donations, grants, and volunteer work for funding.
Internal Revenue Service
The U.S. federal agency responsible for the collection of taxes and enforcement of tax laws.
Substantial Part Test
A tax law guideline used to determine whether a nonprofit organization's lobbying activities are extensive enough to affect its tax-exempt status, by evaluating if a significant portion of its activities are focused on influencing legislation.
Q1: According to Foot, Thomson's violinist case establishes
Q1: Which is the most prominent Supreme Court
Q1: Held maintains that seeing women as emotional
Q9: Rachels argues that psychological egoism rests on
Q10: According to Davis, sexual harassment causes significant
Q11: Rachels argues that the conventional doctrine:<br>A) is
Q13: In which case did the Supreme Court
Q24: In Barefoot v. Estelle, the Court upheld
Q30: In the case known as "reverse-Witherspoon" the
Q31: According to Foot, the crucial moral distinction