Examlex
Thomas Nagel: Death
Suppose that death is the permanent end of human existence. If so, is death bad for the person who dies? Some argue that such a claim is senseless, on the grounds that nothing can be bad for a person who no longer exists. Nagel rejects these arguments, and defends the view that death is bad for us. In Nagel's view, death is not bad because of any of the positive features of death, but because it deprives us of the goods that life contains. Nagel defends his view from three objections.
The first objection is based on the assumption that nothing can be good or bad for someone unless it is experienced as pleasant or unpleasant. Because the dead do not experience anything, it seems that death cannot be bad for us. Nagel responds by denying the assumption behind the objection. We can be harmed by people betraying us behind our backs and without our knowledge, and we can even be harmed by people neglecting our wishes after our deaths.
The second objection is that death cannot be bad for a person, because after death there is simply no subject for which anything can be good or bad. In response, Nagel claims that it would be bad for a person to be reduced to the cognitive level of an infant, even if he remained perfectly content. The badness of such a fate is not undermined by the contention that the original person no longer exists, for the badness is grounded in the contrast between what actually transpired and possible alternatives. Such a fate is bad because it deprives a person of potential goods. Nagel claims that death is similar in this respect.
The third, and final, objection is this: because we were not harmed by our prenatal nonexistence, we cannot be harmed by posthumous nonexistence. Nagel responds that although our nonexistence before our birth did not deprive us of anything, death deprives us of time that we would otherwise be alive. Ultimately, then, Nagel concludes that these three objections fail to undermine the thought that death is bad for us.
-Nagel claims that when life contains more negative experiences than positive ones, it is not worth living.
Retinex Theory
A theory explaining how the human eye perceives color, proposing that the brain uses comparative information from different light wavelengths.
Cortex
The outer layer of the cerebrum of the brain, involved in a variety of high-level brain functions such as thought, memory, and consciousness.
Bipolar Cells
A type of neuron found in the retina, playing a key role in visual processing by transmitting signals from photoreceptors to ganglion cells.
Color Constancy
The perceptual phenomenon by which the colors of objects are perceived as relatively constant even under changing lighting conditions.
Q7: When the new Governor came in, what
Q9: States have the power to set their
Q15: Marquis concludes that abortion is seriously wrong:<br>A)
Q15: Thomas emphasizes how teaching does not only
Q17: According to the text, although the Supreme
Q19: Thomson notes that the bystander does not
Q27: The AEDPA encourages same-claim successive petitions but
Q30: Shue claims that wealthy industrialized countries should
Q31: In Foot's case of the Judge's Two
Q36: Researchers should only report on statistics supportive