Examlex
Thomas Nagel: Death
Suppose that death is the permanent end of human existence. If so, is death bad for the person who dies? Some argue that such a claim is senseless, on the grounds that nothing can be bad for a person who no longer exists. Nagel rejects these arguments, and defends the view that death is bad for us. In Nagel's view, death is not bad because of any of the positive features of death, but because it deprives us of the goods that life contains. Nagel defends his view from three objections.
The first objection is based on the assumption that nothing can be good or bad for someone unless it is experienced as pleasant or unpleasant. Because the dead do not experience anything, it seems that death cannot be bad for us. Nagel responds by denying the assumption behind the objection. We can be harmed by people betraying us behind our backs and without our knowledge, and we can even be harmed by people neglecting our wishes after our deaths.
The second objection is that death cannot be bad for a person, because after death there is simply no subject for which anything can be good or bad. In response, Nagel claims that it would be bad for a person to be reduced to the cognitive level of an infant, even if he remained perfectly content. The badness of such a fate is not undermined by the contention that the original person no longer exists, for the badness is grounded in the contrast between what actually transpired and possible alternatives. Such a fate is bad because it deprives a person of potential goods. Nagel claims that death is similar in this respect.
The third, and final, objection is this: because we were not harmed by our prenatal nonexistence, we cannot be harmed by posthumous nonexistence. Nagel responds that although our nonexistence before our birth did not deprive us of anything, death deprives us of time that we would otherwise be alive. Ultimately, then, Nagel concludes that these three objections fail to undermine the thought that death is bad for us.
-Lucretius famously argued that because one is not bothered by the eternity of nonexistence that preceded one's birth, one should not be troubled by death. What does Nagel think is wrong with this argument? Whose view do you find more plausible and why?
Left-hand Margin
The space to the left side of a page in a document, important for ensuring readability and proper document formatting.
Promotional Offers
Special deals, discounts, or incentives provided to consumers as a part of marketing and sales strategies.
Purposes
The reasons or objectives behind an action, decision, or creation.
Policies
A set of principles, rules, guidelines, or procedures formulated or adopted by an organization or government to guide its actions and decisions.
Q7: Singer argues that charitable actions are supererogatory.
Q10: Write an essay critically examining what you
Q11: After Furman, states revised their laws in
Q12: Thomson argues that no one is morally
Q14: According to Nagel, betrayal is bad because
Q24: According to Sinnott-Armstrong, many of our moral
Q24: According to Thomson, if one grants that
Q24: According to Wolf-Devine, affirmative action is often
Q27: One of the reasons Justice O'Conner said
Q32: Female and minority students don't need faculty