Examlex
In the case of Smith v. Spisak, Spisak entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, at one point claiming to be a disciple of:
Hypothetical Syllogism
A logical argument with two conditional statements followed by a conclusion that infers from the antecedent of one statement to the consequence of the other.
Categorical Syllogism
A form of deductive reasoning consisting of three propositions: a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion, each of which states something about categories of things.
Hypothetical
Based on or serving as a hypothesis, a supposed but unproven premise or supposition used as the basis for further reasoning.
Disjunctive
A logical term referring to a choice between alternatives, often expressed in the format "A or B".
Q2: Thomson concludes that it is permissible to
Q2: According to Crouch, women all over the
Q14: Taylor maintains that the myth of Sisyphus
Q16: Capital juries often must decide whether a
Q16: Despite their treatment of farm animals, factory
Q19: In the interest of maintaining _, at
Q21: What are some of the most important
Q26: A relationship between two variables is not
Q28: The first case following the reinstatement of
Q29: Do you agree with Thomson that pushing