Solved

In This Article Edwards Attacks the Cosmological Argument, Specifically Aquinas's

question 13

Multiple Choice

In this article Edwards attacks the cosmological argument, specifically Aquinas's causal and contingency versions, holding that the argument fails at several points. Against the causal argument, he argues that the premise asserting the impossibility of an infinite series is false. Even if the argument were sound, he says, it would not prove the existence of a single first cause because a plurality of causes cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, the argument is not helped by the theist's distinction between causes that bring something into existence (causes in fieri) and causes that sustain something in existence (causes in esse) . Some defend the causal argument by insisting that even if there were an infinite series of causes, there still must be an ultimate cause of the series as a whole. Edwards counters that such notions rest on the "erroneous assumption that the series is something over and above the members of which it is composed." Against the contingency argument, Edwards maintains that to explain a contingent phenomenon, we do not need to posit a necessary being and that those who make such a demand beg the question at issue.
-According to Edwards, the advocates of the causal argument seem to confuse an infinite series with

Definitions:

Own Mortality

The awareness of one’s inevitable death; contemplating one’s life span and the transient nature of human life.

Age Ranges

Categories or intervals of age used for the classification of populations based on chronological age.

Impending Death

A term used to describe a situation where death is expected to occur soon due to terminal illness or severe health condition.

Nurse's Best Action

The most appropriate and effective action a nurse can take in any given clinical situation, based on evidence-based practice and patient needs.