Examlex

Solved

In This Article Edwards Attacks the Cosmological Argument, Specifically Aquinas's

question 2

True/False

In this article Edwards attacks the cosmological argument, specifically Aquinas's causal and contingency versions, holding that the argument fails at several points. Against the causal argument, he argues that the premise asserting the impossibility of an infinite series is false. Even if the argument were sound, he says, it would not prove the existence of a single first cause because a plurality of causes cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, the argument is not helped by the theist's distinction between causes that bring something into existence (causes in fieri) and causes that sustain something in existence (causes in esse). Some defend the causal argument by insisting that even if there were an infinite series of causes, there still must be an ultimate cause of the series as a whole. Edwards counters that such notions rest on the "erroneous assumption that the series is something over and above the members of which it is composed." Against the contingency argument, Edwards maintains that to explain a contingent phenomenon, we do not need to posit a necessary being and that those who make such a demand beg the question at issue.
-Paley proves the existence of a God with restricted features.


Definitions:

Organizational Buyers

Businesses, governments, or institutions that purchase goods or services for use in the production of other goods and services, for resale, or for the organization’s operations.

Reseller Market

A market wherein goods or services are purchased for the purpose of resale rather than personal use.

Government Market

A market segment where the main customer is any government entity, purchasing products or services for public service.

Organizational Buyer

An organization that purchases goods or services for its own use or for further production, including companies, governments, and institutions, not individual consumers.

Related Questions