Pascal Argues That If We Do a Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Matter

question 9

Multiple Choice

Pascal argues that if we do a cost-benefit analysis of the matter, it turns out that it is eminently reasonable to get ourselves to believe that God exists, regardless of whether we have good evidence for that belief. The argument goes something like this: Regarding the proposition "God exists," reason is neutral. It can neither prove nor disprove it. But we must make a choice on this matter because not to choose for God is in effect to choose against God and lose the possible benefits that belief would bring. Because these benefits of faith promise to be infinite and the loss equally infinite, we must take a gamble on faith.
-According to Pascal, it would be irrational

• A) to bet that God exists.
• B) not to bet that God exists.
• C) to bet at all.
• D) not to bet against God.

---

Definitions:

Par Value

The nominal or face value of a bond, share of stock, or coupon as stated by the issuer, which may not reflect the market value.

Net Loss

The amount by which total expenses exceed total revenues for a business, indicating a negative financial performance for a specific period.

Common Stock

A type of equity security that represents ownership in a corporation, granting holders voting rights and a share in the company’s profits through dividends.

Share Earnings

Often referred to as earnings per share (EPS), it's the portion of a company's profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock.