Examlex
Chalmers argues for a theory of mind known as "property dualism" (also "nonreductive materialism" and "naturalistic dualism"). In this view, mental states, or properties, are distinct from physical properties, and arise from the physical properties without being reducible to, or identical to, them (and without being some kind of Cartesian substance). Philosophers like to say that this relationship between the mental and physical is one of supervenience-that is, mental properties supervene on the physical ones. This means that something possesses a mental property in virtue of having a physical property. The mental property depends on the physical one, arises from it, but is not identical to it. If true, reductive materialism must be false. "This failure of materialism," says Chalmers, "leads to a kind of dualism: there are both physical and nonphysical features of the world." Mental properties are features of the world that are "over and above the physical features of the world."
-Searle thinks that humans are machines that can think.
Construct
refers to an abstract concept, theory, or phenomenon that is specifically chosen or created for a particular research study or theoretical framework.
Hypothesized Effect
The predicted outcome or influence one variable is expected to have on another within a research study.
Assessment Process
A systematic evaluation or measurement of a subject, individual, or group's performance, skills, or knowledge using various tools and methods.
Participant Functions
Describes the various roles or contributions of participants in a study or a process.
Q1: Camus thinks that Sisyphus is sustained by
Q2: Feminists have presented philosophical critiques of philosophers'
Q4: Rowe acknowledges that the case of the
Q4: Wollstonecraft says Rousseau believes that the whole
Q7: In Hobbes's view, the commonwealth must share
Q8: Wollstonecraft asserts that men recommend as the
Q9: Frankfurt is a compatibilist.
Q9: Sisyphus triumphs because he knows he can
Q11: Mill would never agree to restrict a
Q12: Pojman says that the publicity argument actually