In the Schauer V

question 15

Multiple Choice

In the Schauer v.Mandarin Gems of California,Inc.case,the court held:

• A) the plaintiff was entitled to proceed with her contract claim against the jeweler because the jeweler must have understood that she was an intended beneficiary of the sales contract.
• B) both of the contracting parties must intend to benefit the third party to create a right to sue in the third party.
• C) a specific manifestation by the promisor of an intent to benefit the third person is required to create a third party beneficiary contract.
• D) the plaintiff was a donee beneficiary and, as such, she had no right to sue.