Compare and Contrast the Difference Between Compelling State Interest, Intermediate

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Compelling state interest, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis scrutiny are three different standards used by courts to evaluate the constitutionality of laws or government actions.

Compelling state interest is the highest standard of review and is applied when a fundamental right or a suspect classification is at stake. Under this standard, the government must demonstrate that the law or action serves a compelling state interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. This standard is used in cases involving issues such as race, religion, or fundamental rights like freedom of speech or the right to vote.

Intermediate scrutiny is a mid-level standard of review and is applied when a law or action involves a quasi-suspect classification, such as gender or legitimacy. Under this standard, the government must show that the law or action is substantially related to an important government interest. This standard is often used in cases involving gender discrimination.

Rational basis scrutiny is the lowest standard of review and is applied to most laws or government actions. Under this standard, the government only needs to show that the law or action is rationally related to a legitimate government interest. This standard is used in cases involving economic or social regulations.

The adoption of each standard can significantly affect the chances of a statute being found unconstitutional. Laws or government actions that are subject to compelling state interest scrutiny are more likely to be found unconstitutional because they must meet a very high standard of justification. On the other hand, laws subject to rational basis scrutiny are more likely to be upheld as constitutional because they only need to have a rational relationship to a legitimate government interest. Intermediate scrutiny falls somewhere in between, with laws being more likely to be upheld than under compelling state interest scrutiny, but less likely than under rational basis scrutiny.

In summary, the standard of scrutiny applied by the court can have a significant impact on the constitutionality of a law or government action, with higher standards making it more difficult for the government to justify its actions and increasing the likelihood of a statute being found unconstitutional.

Compare and Contrast the Difference Between Compelling State Interest, Intermediate

Definitions: