Write an Essay Comparing and Contrasting Error Theory and Expressivism

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Error theory and expressivism are two prominent theories in metaethics that offer different perspectives on the nature of moral judgments and the truth value of moral statements. In this essay, I will compare and contrast these two theories and argue that error theory is more plausible than expressivism.

Error theory, as proposed by J.L. Mackie, argues that moral judgments are systematically mistaken because they presuppose the existence of objective moral facts that do not actually exist. According to error theory, when we make moral judgments, we are making claims about the world that are fundamentally false. In contrast, expressivism, as advocated by philosophers like Simon Blackburn and Allan Gibbard, posits that moral judgments are not truth-apt statements but rather expressions of our attitudes, emotions, or desires. According to expressivism, when we make moral judgments, we are not making claims about the world but rather expressing our personal feelings or preferences.

One key difference between error theory and expressivism is their stance on the truth value of moral statements. Error theory denies the existence of objective moral truths, arguing that all moral statements are false. In contrast, expressivism denies the truth-aptness of moral statements altogether, claiming that they are not the kind of statements that can be true or false. Another difference lies in their implications for moral discourse and practice. Error theory suggests that we should abandon the idea of objective moral truths and instead focus on understanding the origins and functions of moral beliefs. Expressivism, on the other hand, encourages us to see moral language as a tool for expressing and negotiating our attitudes and values.

In considering which account is more plausible, I find error theory to be more convincing. While both error theory and expressivism offer compelling insights into the nature of moral judgments, error theory provides a more coherent and comprehensive explanation of the phenomenon. Error theory's rejection of objective moral truths aligns with the lack of evidence for such truths in the world, and its explanation for the prevalence of moral beliefs as stemming from evolutionary and cultural factors is more persuasive than expressivism's emphasis on subjective attitudes and emotions.

Furthermore, error theory's implications for moral discourse and practice are more practical and actionable. By recognizing the error in our moral judgments, we can adopt a more humble and open-minded approach to moral issues, acknowledging the diversity of moral beliefs and values without the need to assert the existence of objective moral truths. In contrast, expressivism's focus on personal attitudes and emotions may lead to a relativistic view of morality that undermines the possibility of moral progress and ethical reasoning.

In conclusion, while both error theory and expressivism offer valuable insights into the nature of moral judgments, error theory provides a more plausible and compelling account. Its rejection of objective moral truths and its implications for moral discourse and practice make it a more coherent and practical theory compared to expressivism.

Write an Essay Comparing and Contrasting Error Theory and Expressivism

Definitions: