Match Up the Following Arguments in Regards to Barristers Being

question 11

Multiple Choice

Match up the following arguments in regards to barristers being sued for negligence to their meaning
-The 'cab rank'

• A)The most substantial argument was that it might be contrary to the public interest for a court to retry a case which had been decided by another court
• B)The argument started from the well-established rule that a witness was absolutely immune from liability for anything that he said in court. So were the judge, counsel and the parties. They could not be sued for libel, malicious falsehood or conspiring to
• C)The argument was that a barrister who was obliged to accept any client would be unfairly exposed to vexatious claims by clients for whom any sensible lawyer with freedom of action would have refused to act

---

Definitions:

Rape Victims

Individuals who have experienced sexual assault or forced sexual intercourse against their will.

Attackers

Individuals or entities that attempt to exploit vulnerabilities for malicious purposes.

Age 35

Typically a demographic reference point used in studies to delineate a specific age group or milestone in lifespan development.

Torture

The use of brutal, degrading, and disorienting strategies to reduce victims to a state of utter helplessness.