Match Up the Following Arguments in Regards to Barristers Being

question 8

Multiple Choice

Match up the following arguments in regards to barristers being sued for negligence to their meaning
-Collateral Attack

• A)The most substantial argument was that it might be contrary to the public interest for a court to retry a case which had been decided by another court
• B)The argument started from the well-established rule that a witness was absolutely immune from liability for anything that he said in court. So were the judge, counsel and the parties. They could not be sued for libel, malicious falsehood or conspiring to
• C)The argument was that a barrister who was obliged to accept any client would be unfairly exposed to vexatious claims by clients for whom any sensible lawyer with freedom of action would have refused to act

---

Definitions:

Arbitrageur

An individual or entity that engages in arbitrage, which involves buying securities in one market at a lower price and selling them in another market at a higher price to profit from the price difference.

Exchange Rate

The conversion value of one currency relative to another.

Euros

The eurozone's official currency, used by 19 out of 27 member states in the European Union.

Foreign Exchange

The trading of currencies from different countries, determining the exchange rates based on supply and demand.