Match Up the Following Arguments in Regards to Barristers Being

question 8

Multiple Choice

Match up the following arguments in regards to barristers being sued for negligence to their meaning
-Collateral Attack

• A)The most substantial argument was that it might be contrary to the public interest for a court to retry a case which had been decided by another court
• B)The argument started from the well-established rule that a witness was absolutely immune from liability for anything that he said in court. So were the judge, counsel and the parties. They could not be sued for libel, malicious falsehood or conspiring to
• C)The argument was that a barrister who was obliged to accept any client would be unfairly exposed to vexatious claims by clients for whom any sensible lawyer with freedom of action would have refused to act

---

Definitions:

Cost-Plus Approach

A pricing strategy where a fixed percentage or amount of profit is added on top of the cost to produce or purchase goods or services.

Selling Expenses

are costs associated with marketing and selling a company's products or services, including advertising, sales staff salaries, and commissions.

Differential Revenue

The difference in revenue expected from two different decisions or alternatives.

Direct Materials

Raw materials that are directly traceable to the production of specific goods or services and are an integral part of the finished product.