According to Arrow, If a Decision-Making Procedure Met Conditions P

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Kenneth Arrow's impossibility theorem, also known as Arrow's paradox, is a fundamental result in social choice theory and economics. Arrow's theorem states that when voters have three or more distinct alternatives (options), no rank-order electoral system can convert the ranked preferences of individuals into a community-wide (complete and transitive) ranking while also meeting a specified set of criteria. These criteria are often abbreviated as P, I, D, and U, along with the rationality assumption:

- P (Pareto efficiency): If every voter prefers one option over another, then the group ranking should do the same.
- I (Independence of irrelevant alternatives): The group ranking between any two alternatives should not be affected by individual preferences over other irrelevant alternatives.
- D (Non-dictatorship): The group preference should not be dictated by a single individual; no single voter possesses the power to always determine the group's preference.
- U (Unrestricted domain or universality): The voting system should accommodate any rational individual preferences among alternatives.
- Rationality assumption: The collective choice should be transitive and consistent.

According to Arrow, if a decision-making procedure met conditions P, I, and D, it could not also meet both the rationality assumption and condition U. This implies that there is a fundamental trade-off that all political institutions must face when designing a voting system or decision-making process. The trade-off is between creating a system that is fair, respects individual preferences, and is rational in its aggregation of those preferences.

In essence, Arrow's theorem suggests that it is impossible to design a decision-making process that perfectly reflects the will of the people in a fair and consistent manner. Any system that is devised must sacrifice at least one of the desirable criteria. This has profound implications for political institutions, as it means that they must decide which criteria are most important to uphold and which they are willing to compromise on.

For example, a political institution might prioritize the rationality of group choices and Pareto efficiency but may have to accept limitations on the universality of individual preferences. Alternatively, they might prioritize non-dictatorship and universality but face challenges in maintaining the rationality of collective decisions.

In summary, Arrow's theorem highlights the inherent difficulties in creating a perfect decision-making system and forces political institutions to acknowledge and navigate the trade-offs between different democratic ideals.

According to Arrow, If a Decision-Making Procedure Met Conditions P

Definitions: