Examlex
Commitment Problems and Democratization
In a paper entitled, "Commitment Problems in Emerging Democracies: The Case of Religious Parties," Stathis Kalyvas (2000) examines whether religious parties are compatible with secular and liberal democratic institutions. He concludes that religious parties may be compatible with democracy so long as they can credibly commit not to impose a theocratic dictatorship if they come to power. He goes on to argue that some religions are better able to provide these credible commitments than others. We now provide a Religious Party Game that throws light on the credible commitment problem facing religious parties that Kalyvas describes.
The two players in our game are a dictatorial regime (Regime: that has recently introduced a process of democratization and a religious party [Religious Party] that seeks to gain power through the newly proposed democratic elections) . The Religious Party is expected to win the elections and many fear that it will turn the country into a theocracy rather than continuing the process of democratic consolidation. The Regime has to decide whether to hold the elections as scheduled or to cancel them and retain power as a dictatorship. If elections are held and the Religious Party wins (which we are assuming will happen) , then the Religious Party has to decide whether to pursue a moderate political agenda and support democratic consolidation or to subvert the democratization process and create a religious regime. The Religious Party comes in two types-moderate and radical. One way to think about these types is that religious parties have both moderate and radical factions; whichever faction is dominant determines the Religious Party's type. Moderate religious parties prefer democratic consolidation to establishing a theocracy, whereas radical religious parties prefer the opposite.
There are three possible outcomes in this game: Continued Dictatorship, Religious Dictatorship, and Democratic Consolidation. Figure 3 illustrates an incomplete information version of this game with cardinal payoffs in which the Regime does not know whether they are interacting with a moderate Religious Party or a radical Religious Party. Now answer the following questions.
Figure 3: Radical Religious Party Game
-Now that you have solved the subgame on the left, what is the outcome of this subgame?
Intervention
A strategic action or process aimed at influencing a situation or outcome, typically intended to help or improve a condition or problem.
Resolution
The act of finding a solution to a conflict, problem, or contentious issue.
Cambodian Refugees
Individuals who fled Cambodia due to war, persecution, or other disturbances, particularly after the rise of the Khmer Rouge regime in the 1970s.
Culturally Competent
Having the awareness, knowledge, and skills to interact effectively and respectfully with people of different cultures.
Q5: One night you're watching the news with
Q6: Does the European Union have a dominant
Q8: What is likely to occur if officers,
Q11: Marketing managers use marketing research for all
Q13: When dictators liberalize in an attempt to
Q23: In which system(s) is the government responsible
Q34: What is similar about their structure?
Q37: When individuals in a variety of different
Q39: "Democratic leaders are more likely to provide
Q41: When we see a dictator removed from