How Might Utilitarians and Kantians Differ in Their Views About

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Utilitarians and Kantians have different perspectives on the moral permissibility of biomedical research on animals.

Utilitarians, who believe in the principle of maximizing overall happiness and minimizing suffering, may argue that biomedical research on animals is morally permissible if it leads to the development of medical treatments that benefit a large number of humans. They would weigh the potential benefits to human health against the suffering of animals and may ultimately support such research if they believe the benefits outweigh the costs.

On the other hand, Kantians, who emphasize the importance of treating individuals with respect and dignity, may argue that using animals for biomedical research is morally impermissible. According to Kantian ethics, animals have intrinsic value and should not be treated merely as a means to an end. They would argue that using animals for research violates their rights and fails to treat them with the respect they deserve as sentient beings.

In summary, utilitarians may be more likely to support biomedical research on animals if they believe it will lead to greater overall happiness, while Kantians are more likely to oppose such research on the grounds of respecting the intrinsic value and rights of animals.

How Might Utilitarians and Kantians Differ in Their Views About

Definitions: