Use Indirect Truth Tables to Determine Whether Each of the Following

question 233

Multiple Choice

use indirect truth tables to determine whether each of the following arguments is valid. If the argument is invalid, choose an option which presents a counterexample. (There may be other counterexamples as well.)
-D ⊃ (E $\lor$ F)
D ⊃ (G $\lor$ F)
∼(F $\lor$ H) / D ⊃ (E • G)

• A) Valid
• B) Invalid. Counterexample when D, E and F are true and G and H are false
• C) Invalid. Counterexample when D and E are true and F, G, and H are false
• D) Invalid. Counterexample when D, G, and H are true and E and F are false
• E) Invalid. Counterexample when D and G are true and E, F, and H are false

Identify and explain existentialist sensations and their implications.

Recognize the significance of self-awareness in human psychological functioning.

Define and differentiate key existentialist and humanistic psychology terms.

Explain the process and criteria for achieving free will and authentic existence according to humanistic psychologists.

---

Definitions:

Confidence

The degree of certainty or trust in a particular outcome or result, often expressed in terms of probability.

Confidence Interval

An interval estimate derived from a sample that is likely to cover an unknown population parameter with a specified level of confidence.

Proportion

A statistical measure expressing the part of a whole, often presented as a fraction, decimal, or percentage.

Confidence Interval

An assembly of numerical values, generated from sample data, aimed at including the unexposed value of a population parameter.