Examlex
Chevaldina had a business dispute with Katz, a well-known real estate tycoon. Chevaldina had a blog devoted to criticizing Katz's business practices. She found an unflattering photo of Katz and posted it on the blog. Katz then obtained a copyright on the photo and sued Chevaldina for copyright infringement for publishing the photo on the blog without permission. The appeals court held that Katz had:
Present Intent
The current intention or determination to engage in a particular action or effect a legal consequence.
Subjective Standard
A legal standard that is based on personal feelings, tastes, or opinions, making it subject to individual judgment rather than objective observation.
Silent Acceptance
An implied agreement to a proposal demonstrated through an individual's actions rather than explicitly expressed consent.
Common Law
Law that is derived from court decisions over time, rather than statutes or written laws enacted by a legislative body.
Q29: Which of the following is an example
Q119: An advantage of patent protection is that
Q171: The law of torts recognizes two kinds
Q185: Adidas is a famous trademark. If another
Q186: A local government's police power is, generally:<br>A)
Q223: In Audi AG v. D'Amato the appeals
Q270: In Smith v. Kulig, Smith was killed
Q285: The Restatement of Contracts is an authoritative
Q346: In Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace the court
Q584: A transfer of contractual duties to a