When Analyzing Tax Authorities, the Researcher Must Decide If the Authority

question 17

Multiple Choice

When analyzing tax authorities, the researcher must decide if the authority requires a factual judgment or an evaluative judgment. The difference between the two can be described as follows:

• A) In making an evaluative judgment, the researcher can provide a definitive answer to the research question.
• B) In making a factual judgment, the authority may be subject to interpretation.
• C) In making an evaluative judgment, the researcher must draw a subjective conclusion that results in a qualified answer.
• D) There is little difference between a factual judgment and an evaluative judgment.

---

Definitions:

Democratic Leadership Style

A leadership approach where decisions are made with the input of team members, fostering a sense of collaboration and empowerment among the group.

Directive Leadership Style

A leadership approach characterized by providing clear instructions, setting defined goals, and directly supervising tasks and performances.

Individual Motives

The personal drives, desires, and reasons that propel individuals to act in certain ways.

Experience of Flow

A psychological state where an individual engaging in a task experiences complete absorption, characterized by intense concentration, full participation, and pleasure.