Why Was the Conduct Found to Be Misleading and Deceptive

question 20

Multiple Choice

Why was the conduct found to be misleading and deceptive in Pacific Dunlop v Hogan (1989) 23 FCR 553?

• A)The use of the name might cause confusion in the minds of some consumers.
• B)The conduct created the false impression that a commercial relationship existed between the parties.
• C)The conduct was not found to be misleading and deceptive.
• D)The misconception was caused by use of an existing name which already had a well-established reputation.