In Powell V

question 30

Multiple Choice

In Powell v.Washburn,where Powell sued the developer of a planned community he lived in for changing the covenants,conditions,and restrictions (CC&Rs) to allow recreational vehicles as residences in the development,the Arizona high court held that:

• A)enforcing the intent of the parties who established the covenant is the "cardinal principle" in interpreting restrictive covenants
• B)restrictive covenants should be reevaluated by the courts "in terms of modern trends"
• C)enforcing the intent of the parties who established the covenant is secondary to increasing property values
• D)restrictive covenants have no true legal power in Arizona
• E)none of the other choices are correct

---

Definitions:

Predictability

The ability to be anticipated or to accurately forecast future events or behaviors based on current knowledge or patterns.

Regularity

The quality or state of being consistent or uniform in procedure, form, or arrangement; often referring to patterns or rhythms in nature or behavior.

Actively Playful

Engaging in activity with energy and enthusiasm, often referring to the lively and spirited manner in children's play.

Noisy

describes environments or sounds that are loud and disruptive, making it hard to hear or concentrate.