In Nystrom V

question 87

Multiple Choice

In Nystrom v.Trex Company,where Nystrom sued Trex for patent infringement on an exterior flooring board,the appeals court held that Nystrom's patent:

• A)failed for obviousness,so there was no fringement
• B)failed because it was prior art,so there was no infringement
• C)was valid,so the infringement claim could proceed
• D)was infringed by Trex,but there was no evidence of financial harm,so no damages
• E)none of the other choices

---

Definitions:

Profit-Maximizing Quantity

The level of production at which a firm achieves the maximum possible profit, where marginal revenue equals marginal cost.

Minimized Cost

The lowest possible expense at which a company can produce a product without sacrificing the quality or quantity of the product.

Profit or Loss

The financial result of business operations, calculated as the difference between revenue and expenses, indicating the financial health of the business.

Excess Capacity

A situation where a firm is operating below its maximum output level, indicating that the company can produce more goods with the existing resources if there is higher demand.