In Center for Biological Diversity V

question 160

Multiple Choice

In Center for Biological Diversity v.Marina Point Development Assoc. ,involving a development on a lake that received needed permits to proceed,the court held that the opposition by the Center for Biological Diversity:

• A)no longer mattered,as it participated in the permit process,and that was ended
• B)was appropriate to continue monitoring performance,but since the developer was in compliance with the permits,it could not block progress
• C)meant the permits would be cancelled,as the Center was not allowed to participate in the permit consideration process
• D)was beyond what was allowed by law,which imposed needless costs on the developer,so it would pay the attorney fees the developer incurred
• E)none of the other choices