Examlex
Criminal appeals are generally routine because they seldom raise meritorious issues (Primus, 2007; Wold & Caldeira, 1980) . Current standards of effective assistance of counsel often force lawyers to appeal, no matter how slight the odds of appellate court reversal. As a result, a significant number of criminal appeals lack substantial merit. For example, of the roughly 5,125 written dispositions in criminal appeals filed by defendants in the California Court of Appeals in 2010, the court reversed only 226 (4%) convictions (Judicial Council of California, 2011) . Why do criminal appeals rarely succeed? First, the appellate standards of review applicable to most decision-making during criminal trials are highly deferential to trial court outcomes (Primus, 2007) . Second, appellate courts often find that no reversible error was committed during the trial court proceedings.
-What defendants did Neubauer (1991) find were most likely to win on appeal?
Fairness
The impartial and just treatment of individuals without favoritism or discrimination.
Perceived Inequity
A feeling of unfairness experienced when an individual compares their own work reward ratio to that of others.
Under-Rewarded
Feeling or being inadequately compensated or acknowledged for one’s efforts or contributions.
Over-Rewarded
A situation where an individual receives more recognition or compensation than what is perceived to be fair or deserved.
Q1: "Law on the books" is found in
Q29: From the case citation Miranda v.Arizona, 384
Q36: Which of the following is NOT an
Q40: Learning the tasks associated with the job
Q47: The party who initiates or files the
Q60: Differentiation<br>A)The process of breaking organizational goals into
Q66: Appellate courts review the evidence presented a
Q86: Which of the following are negative consequences
Q117: A relatively new source of work-home conflict
Q124: Women have been quicker to share the