Examlex
Since 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court has raised serious doubts about the constitutionality of many state sentencing guidelines, holding that other than a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory maximum must be tried before a jury (Apprendi v. New Jersey, 2000) . Based on this reasoning, in 2004 the Court struck down sentencing guidelines in the State of Washington, holding that the Sixth Amendment gives juries (and not judges) the power to make a finding of fact beyond a reasonable doubt (Blakely v. Washington, 2004) . The dissenters argued that the decision will serve only to increase judicial discretion and lead to less uniformity in sentencing, perhaps leading to increasing racial discrimination.
-Failure to submit a sentencing factor to a jury is subject to what kind of review?
Starting Salaries
The initial compensation offered to an individual when they begin a new role or job; often analyzed in studies concerning labor economics.
Global Marketing
The process of conceiving and executing marketing strategies that target international markets and audiences.
Normal Distributions
A type of continuous probability distribution for a real-valued random variable that is symmetric and describes data that cluster around a mean.
Matched Pairs
An experimental design where each subject is paired with another subject that has similar characteristics, but one receives the treatment and the other does not.
Q25: Grand juries decide the guilt or innocence
Q36: What is the best-known example of shock
Q46: The practice of state courts using state
Q51: Many judges say that sentencing is the
Q54: What is the last of the six
Q58: What type of evidence serves as an
Q77: Discretionary decisions made by a judge will
Q78: Of the delinquency cases brought to the
Q81: What is a key issue in the
Q86: Which of the following is not one