Examlex
Pierette entered into a contract with Hugo.She agreed to deliver a shipment of gold to his jewellery store each week for a year.He agreed to pay a specific price.The contract also said: "The buyer shall have the right to terminate this contract in the event of a substantial change in the market price of gold." After delivering gold to Hugo for several months,Pierette refused to go on with the contract.Her decision to do so was based on the fact that while her contract with Hugo contained a specific price,the market value of gold had suddenly increased a substantial amount.Consequently,she realized that her contract with Hugo no longer made good financial sense from her perspective.Would a court accept that argument from Pierette? Explain your answer.
Q4: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q5: A piece of land called Blackacre is
Q43: The "giant carrot theory" is used to
Q45: Wessam offers to sell Ivan a bicycle
Q48: Unconscionable transactions can be characterized as one-sided
Q48: A share certificate may be a type
Q58: You have developed a business proposal called
Q61: Silvio agreed to perform as a pianist
Q74: Which of the following statements is TRUE?<br>A)Chattels
Q76: "Property law,like nature,abhors a vacuum.Consequently,property rights that