How Do Social Scientists Generally View the Peer-Review Process

question 6

Multiple Choice

How do social scientists generally view the peer-review process?

• A)Its benefits are not worth the time it takes.
• B)The growth of predatory journals has diminished the value of the peer-review process for all journals.
• C)It is very strong and only very occasionally has flaws.
• D)It is a human process,and thus flawed,but on the whole,it is the best method for ensuring quality research.

---

Definitions:

Modest Change

A minor adjustment or slight modification to a process, system, or product.

Gradual Change

Incremental alterations, modifications, or developments occurring slowly over a period of time.

Evolutions

The gradual development and progression of species or systems over time, often associated with biological, technological, or organizational changes.

Frame-bending Change

Significant transformation within an organization that alters the existing structures or methods, but does not completely overhaul the organizational framework.