Nate's Testimony Would Be Considered Circumstantial Evidence Because

question 23

Multiple Choice

Nate's testimony would be considered circumstantial evidence because:

• A)if believed, it makes it more probable that Ricky stole the ring.
• B)the judge gave the jury an instruction on limited admissibility.
• C)the jury must draw an inference before they can conclude that Ricky stole the ring.
• D)it only establishes the theft if the parties stipulate to his testimony.

---

Definitions:

Whole Number

A whole number that is not a fraction or decimal.

Whole Number

An integer value that is not fractional or decimal, positive, negative, or zero.

Implied Decimal

A decimal point not explicitly shown but understood in the context of the number.

Multiples

Numbers that are the product of a given number and any other whole number.