Nate's Testimony Would Be Considered Circumstantial Evidence Because

question 23

Multiple Choice

Nate's testimony would be considered circumstantial evidence because:

• A)if believed, it makes it more probable that Ricky stole the ring.
• B)the judge gave the jury an instruction on limited admissibility.
• C)the jury must draw an inference before they can conclude that Ricky stole the ring.
• D)it only establishes the theft if the parties stipulate to his testimony.