Compare and Contrast Interrogation During a Stop Based on Reasonable

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is When an officer detains someone based on reasonable suspicion, the officer may briefly question the person who has been detained.Miranda warnings are not required.Proceeding without the warnings gives the officer a better chance of obtain information than he/she would have had if the suspect was given the Miranda warnings.On the other hand, the questioning must be brief.
When a person is under arrest he/she is in custody; Miranda warnings must be given before the person can be questioned.Giving the Miranda warnings makes it more likely that the suspect will recognize his/her right to refuse to answer questions. If the suspect waives his/her rights, the questioning can continue until either the officer or the suspect stops it.The Supreme Court, in the Miranda decision, viewed questioning in the police station as inherently coercive.To balance the scales, the court ruled that Miranda warnings were required before police could conduct custodial interrogation.

Compare and Contrast Interrogation During a Stop Based on Reasonable

Definitions: