In the Case of WeGo Kayaking Ltd

question 1

Multiple Choice

In the case of WeGo Kayaking Ltd. v. Sewid,

• A) malice defeated the defences of qualified privilege and fair comment.
• B) Sevid successfully argued the defence of qualified privilege.
• C) Sevid successfully argued the defence of fair comment.
• D) there was no defamation because innuendo cannot be defamatory.
• E) there was no defamation because the people alleging defamation were dishonest.