Examlex
Ming and Aisha were partners at Fab Builders,which became indebted to Herman Constructions.The partnership was dissolved later,with Aisha leaving the partnership and Ming continuing to operate the business.Herman Constructions sued the former partnership,Ming and Aisha,to recover the price of equipment supplied to the firm before Aisha withdrew.At the time of her withdrawal,the partnership had sufficient assets to pay all firm debts in full.Now,Aisha claims that she is not liable on the debt.Is Aisha liable? State the reasons for your answer.
Q1: Which of the following is true of
Q13: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
Q15: Under the Balancing Approach,in a third-party negligence
Q18: Under the Model Business Corporation Act (MBCA),a
Q29: If a partner continues a partnership beyond
Q32: Which of the following terms is closely
Q34: Wilma locked herself in the trunk of
Q37: Normally,a buyer has the right to inspect
Q43: A partner who wrongfully dissociates:<br>A) loses the
Q43: Which of the following statements is true